China Accuses US of Discrimination in Electric Vehicle Market: WTO Challenges Ahead

China to oppose Biden’s electric vehicle initiatives at the WTO

The United States has been accused of discrimination by China in the electric vehicle market. In response to a new U.S. rule that went into effect on January 1, which excludes electric car buyers from tax credits if critical minerals or other battery components were made by Chinese, Russian, North Korean, or Iranian companies, China has filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The Chinese Commerce Ministry did not specify what prompted the complaint but expressed concerns that the U.S. has implemented discriminatory subsidy policies for new energy vehicles under President Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The Ministry believes that these policies exclude Chinese products, distort fair competition, and disrupt the global supply chain for new energy vehicles. This move could have a significant impact on the global electric vehicle market as China is a dominant player in the battery market for electric vehicles and has a rapidly expanding auto industry that could challenge established carmakers globally.

The European Union has also expressed concerns about Chinese subsidies for electric vehicles under the new U.S. rule. Only 13 out of over 50 EV models on sale in the U.S. were eligible for tax credits, prompting automakers to source eligible parts to qualify for the credits. If the United States were to lose and appeal the ruling, China’s case would likely not progress due to the WTO’s Appellate Body not functioning since late 2019. This could lead to further tensions between China and other countries in regards to trade practices and subsidy policies in the electric vehicle market.

Overall, this case highlights the complexities of international trade and how it can be affected by political and economic factors such as environmental regulations and subsidy policies. The outcome of this dispute will be closely watched by all parties involved as it could have significant implications for both domestic economies and global trade relations in

Leave a Reply